Category Archives

138 Articles

Week #9 Response/Week #9 Response

Reem’s Weekly Response #9

Posted by Reem Malek on

“Backpacks vs. Briefcases: Steps Towards Rhetorical Analysis” by Laura Bollin Carroll explains the necessity of using rhetoric in everyday life. Understanding rhetoric is a principle part of being a well-informed consumer as we are not simply being brainwashed by the media. Taking the time to analyze situations, whether it be why or how the matter relates to you and its importance, provides us the ability to not give in to the persuasion of these creators without purpose. Laura Carroll also addresses how we as humans make rhetorical analysis so routinely, that it has become habitual. Just like the example Laura Carroll continuously refers back to in this article with the meeting a new teacher for the first time, I had been in a similar situation with one of my current Professors. The first day of the semester I walked into the class and seen this small, curly haired,  white women, dressed in trousers and a blouse with a special choice of accessories. She was walking around all jolly and vibrant and enthusiastic it looked fake. Automatically from everything i analyzed about her within the first three minutes of the class, I came to the conclusion that she was this, stuck up, arrogant, self absorbed white women who got away with being the way she is because she was privileged. In the first half of the semester she proved my judgments to be accurate, she would talk about how great she is and how smart and funny she is, she literally called herself a narcissist, it scared me. However, later on in the semester she had left me a note on one of my papers asking me to see her after class. I was livid. I thought she was going to try to violate my paper, but after class we spoke for the first time, and she was so sweet and down to earth, praising my writing and how much potential she sees in my future  asking me questions about my future, she was so eager to speak to me and help me and offered me to speak to her whenever I needed anything that she would always be available during her office hours. I felt horrible after speaking to her, all my judgments made me paint this picture of a monster she was nothing like. That taught me to never judge a book by its cover. If I haven’t had the chance to speak to her personally I would have always have this horrible perception of who she really is. Therefore, we must not always use the judgments we made off of rhetorical analysis as solely our understandings of things.

Week #12 Response/Week #12 Response

Kayla’s Week 12 Response

Posted by Kayla Ye on

MEMBERS: Geetangalie Goberdan, Mohamed Layachi, Reem Malek, Kayla Ye

 

PRESENTATION DATE: Tuesday, May 14

Slide Presentation

 

GROUP NAME: The BCE

 

ROLES: Geetangalie Goberdan-

Mohamed Layachi-

Reem Malek-

Kayla Ye- Researcher

 

TOPIC/ PRODUCT: Headphones

 

NAME OF PRODUCT:

 

DESCRIPTION/ PURPOSE: We’ve all heard of AirPods, Apple’s version of wireless earphones released back in 2016. Since then, people of all ages use them from middle schoolers to people in retirement homes, in hopes of looking for some peace. One must admit, the Airpods were a great idea and the society believed so too, seeing that since then more and more companies released earphones that are similar in design. However, if you have ever actually used Airpods or have known someone who does, you’ve probably heard of people often losing them. The wireless design makes it that these earphones are often easily lost when dropped.

The BCE – Button Cell Earphone is what’s going to pushed Airpods out of existence. Named after the button cell battery who we used as a model for design for these earphones. In simpler terms, the earphone has two parts. One part is the earphone itself. It’s small enough to fit inside the outer-part of the ear canal. The other part however is not another earpiece, it goes on the wrist. There is only one earpiece and it allows for the user to hear the music in both ears.

 

Week #10 Response/Week #10 Response

week 10

Posted by Gabriel Almonte on

Gabriel Almonte 

 

I think I have a unique relationship with technology. I believe Older people are too out of touch with technology while the younger the person the more attached to technology they are. I believe people around my age have the best balance. We grew up while most of the advance were being made but we also had a lot of our childhood where certain things were frowned upon. Some people gfot phones in junior high school others received it high school. Being that we were always at the age where we weren’t considered children, but we also weren’t adults that we could make our own decisions our parents tended to take the cautious route with technology, so we have a good balance of being functional without technology. Many young children today are always growing up with so much technology around them, who knows what the future holds with them. I do think that a balance should be kept because you shouldn’t fall behind like many of the older people have. I believe you should always be able to use the latest tech but shouldn’t need it. I try my best to balance my life, I do use technology a lot and I do use it in times I don’t need it just for the convenience, however I’m very functional without it and I don’t miss it when I don’t have it. A lot of technology is based of horror or thriller genres now, but I believe the future leads to technology be used as propaganda. It’s so easy to voice an opinion while using technology and you can reach endless amounts of people as well. People will use technology to get their points across, trying to convince everyone through media to agree with them.  

Week #9 Response/Week #9 Response

Week 9

Posted by Gabriel Almonte on

Gabriel Almonte 

After reading the article I realized I use rhetorical analysis often. Every semester I get nervous wondering how my teachers will be. I read reviews on ratemyprofessor.com to try to find teachers that are generally liked. However, everyone has their own preferences with teachers. I was enrolled in a writing for engineers’ class with another teacher and she looked older, wore glasses, and didn’t seem mean but seemed serious. I took notes of these things mentally and I was worried if I would be able to excel in this class. She then assigned a 2-page report on why writing courses are important to STEM majors. This being my first engineering class I dropped the class. I quickly searched for other openings and found the class I’m currently enrolled in. After reading good reviews I decided to take another chance on the course. I arrived to the class nervous because I thought the course would be too difficult but I arrived to an environment I wasn’t expecting. The seating arrangement in the class made me feel like the classwork wouldn’t be too stressful. Then the professor walked in and she was young, had tattoos, and a fresh hairstyle. After that, I was happy, I thought I made the decision in switching to the class I’m currently enrolled in. Shortly after my professor came up to me and explained the assignment at hand and a quick description on how the class was. The conversation supported my initial thoughts, I was satisfied that I took the chance after reading the reviews because a professor like this is what I want in all my classes. I tend to connect younger teachers with being more understanding while they try to make the course about learning what I need rather than making me do unnecessary work to keep me busy. While I tend to connect older teachers with just going by the book and not being open to new methods and ways of teaching. I try to avoid that because I believe that things have changed around the world so teaching methods must change as well. 

Week #8 Response/Week #8 Response

week 8

Posted by Gabriel Almonte on

Gabriel Almonte 

Watching this episode was very weird. I felt the guy who was currently in the relationship with the girl was being very overprotective. The girl did start acting weird when her partner came around, but the situation would make anyone uncomfortable, nobody wants to be in a room with an old partner and their current partner as well. Getting drunk then driving to the other man’s house to attack him verbally and physically was uncalled for. He then forces the old partner to delete all memory of his current wife. I believe a memory system like this where you can go back to every moment you’ve witnessed would be hard to forget things that you regret happened. It also effected how the current partner was able to discover things that he didn’t notice when it happened because he got to rewind and focus on all aspects of it. I connected this to my personal experience with relationships because with everything being recorded when people are out people get caught stepping out of their relationship a lot. With all this video and picture evidence today many need evidence to believe anything, with something like what the people in the show had it would be extremely difficult for people to trust anyone. I had mixed feelings on this episode because I feel the husband should’ve reacted much differently in the situation, he was acting erratic once they got home and was taking mental notes once he got to the get together. He then attacks the man his wife cheated on him with which he didn’t deserve, he wasn’t in a relationship with him. Although I don’t agree with his actions, I do think he should know the truth about what his partner was doing. Honesty is important in a relationship and she wasn’t being honest and the memory system they had implemented behind their ears helped him find the truth.  

Week #7 Response/Week #7 Response

Week 7

Posted by Gabriel Almonte on

Gabriel Almonte

The Black Mirror episode “Nosedive” was interesting, I felt like the episode had a lot of characteristics of today’s society while adding a futuristic part to it. The episode had a rating system, people were graded on their interactions with others and everyone could see other’s ratings. It led to a lot of issues in the episode because people didn’t want to associate with people with lower ratings because they were worried it would be frowned upon. I connected this to my experiences in social media because I see a lot of the same things on social media. People with a higher ratio of followers to following are referred to as “Instagram Famous”. These people often will not follow the people they speak to everyday in school or work on Instagram just because they aren’t “Instagram Famous”. I also noticed in the episode the main character wanted to raise her score and was told high ratings from people with high ratings will boost your score. That’s very common in the real world as well, people hold celebrities and people with authority opinions to a higher standard than others just because of their position. That’s why a lot of companies use familiar faces to brand their products because they know people will listen to them. Recently there has been a lot of controversy with this because celebrities need to get money to feed their family but often are advertising products that can be harmful. I was disappointed with the thought process of the episode, but I wasn’t surprised at all because these ideas are very common in the world today. Personally, I find myself stuck in the middle. I don’t want to pretend to be someone else, but I also don’t want others to look down on me. I will always be myself, but at times I must bring out parts of my personality that are better suited for the situation I’m in. For example, in job interviews people must bring out qualities that will show they are a good candidate for the job while wearing formal attire. On a regular day most people wouldn’t speak like they were in an interview and they wouldn’t dress like it either. I thought the rating system had flaws because some people may be a 5 to me and 1 to another person. People should just always have an open mind because there are a lot of good people and opportunities that are missed out on because of preconceived ideas.  

Week #6 Response/Week #6 Response

week 6

Posted by Gabriel Almonte on

Gabriel Almonte 

 

The main point of this episode was to challenge the ethical beliefs of technological fields. Data is a robot created by the company. He then creates another robotic being like him, has feelings, and many other human-like characteristics but wasn’t conceived the same ways as humans. Data considered it as his offspring, he wanted the offspring to pick a gender it had four options and chose to be a human female, he named her Lai. Tensions grew as people had disagreements with what to do with Lai. Data already viewed it as a child, so he grew strong loving feelings for it already People in the company were mad that he created Lai without informing anyone, he then argued that it wouldn’t be a problem if a human created an offspring in private. Other people in the company believed that Lai should be taken to a scientific lab to be tested on to see what the possible outcomes are after she is evaluated. Lai is interviewed where she gains a sense of fear because she thinks something bad may happen to her. To me that is enough to not test her and let her live as a human. However, the company still believes she belongs in a scientific facility. Then everyone finds out that Lai left but later comes back because she malfunctioned and is programmed to come back to Data when she does malfunction. They find out that they must work fast, or she will die, then others start to help out data but, in the end, they had no success and Lai died. Data forgave everyone who disagreed because people who didn’t think of her as human helped another parent when he needed help. If a technological being is behaving similar to a human it should be protected as such.  

Week #3 Response/Week #3 Response

Week 3

Posted by Gabriel Almonte on

Gabriel Almonte 

 

The main point of this episode was to discuss ethics in technology. The episode featured a futuristic robot that had many similar characteristics and functions as humans, the robot could think and had feelings as well. From my understanding it seemed like everyone involved was in the same company but people from different positions of power and different branches were all disagreeing with what was fair to the robot and the future of technology. One branch was fighting for the robot to be left alone because he thought of the robot as a person, the robot developed into what it was in front of him, he grew sentimental love for it. A developer from another branch viewed it as a piece of technology. Therefore, he had no problem with the risks that working on the robot caused. He was only worried about the future of technology. I agree with both sides because if developers can’t work on new technology it ill be hard to make the same technological advances that are occurring right now. I also agree with the other side because seeing people develop these new advances, they can feel n attachment to the product that spent so much time on. I also agree that on some point some technology will be considered human because of how similar it is to normal people. There was one character who compared the unethical beliefs of the other branch to racism. I agree because at a certain point these robots can become almost identical to humans the only difference being the way each group is made. The only thing that must be solved is at what point do these robots are considered humans.  

Skip to toolbar