On May 18, 2017, The New York Times published three-part series called “Antarctica Dispatches”. In this series, The New York Times takes advantage of the advancement of technology to tell the story of Antarctica, the seventh continent. The first part starts off with a map of the continent and there are moving lines to show how the ice is moving, showing them move towards the Ross Sea. When you read the article itself, you learn that the ice sheets are melting at rate so rapid that scientist are worried that sooner or later, coastal cities would have to seek refuge from their own homes due to rise in sea levels. The article also goes on to explain how scientist are attempting to solve this top priority issue and to show the audience what they mean, a video is provided. The interactive video at the bottom of the article allows the viewer to move the camera around and watch the scientist equipment at work. In the article, the author stresses the importance of scientist to figure out a way to slow down the disintegration of the ice sheets and by using these visuals, this importance is stressed beyond words. The interactivity of this article allows the reader to someone experience the urgency and realize the effects that greenhouse gases have on themselves, indirectly. The visuals also act as a summarizer for the article. For people who don’t always have the time to read the full article, the visuals provided show the issue they talk about in the article following. In part two for example, as the reader scrolls, the geographical makeup of Antarctica is shown and there are short captions to indicate whats happening, acting to consolidate information. I think that this way of presenting information, especially in the STEM filed is effective because often, the information regarding STEM subject is dense and not for everyone but using these interactive ways to engage the reader’s attention can capture a wide variety of audiences.

Gillis, Justin, et al. “Miles of Ice Collapsing Into the Sea.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 18 May 2017, www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/05/18/climate/antarctica-ice-melt-climate-change.html.

The main point of Understanding Rhetoric was that rhetoric is important in writing and conveying ideas. The author first introduced rhetoric by explaining why some people believe that rhetoric is bad. The negative ideas that people have today can be traced to Plato who was an Ancient Greek philosopher. Plato believed that rhetoric is bad because it is used to deceive people and distract people from important issues. I can understand why Plato believed this because rhetoric is used in order to persuade people. By using rhetoric, people can be persuaded into doing bad things. Aristotle, on the other hand, believed that rhetoric can be used for good. He believed it can be used to educate people to become good people. I agree with Aristotle because today, rhetoric has been used in order to make people better. For example, the use of rhetoric in advertisements in America against smoking and drinking have persuaded many people to not engage in those activities. Many kids and adults have stopped smoking or drinking because of the negative effects that ads talk about. Another point that the authors emphasized was the importance of ethos, pathos, and logos. Ethos is the credibility of the speaker or writer. Pathos is the use of emotion and logos is the use of logic. Using ethos, pathos and logos are really important in persuading the audience. I once watched a video on Facebook on how to sell anything. The video said that people buy stuff based on emotions and justify it with logic. Consumers will also buy products if the sellers are credible, usually from well-known brands. After reading this comic I realized that sellers use ethos, pathos, and logos in order to persuade consumers into buying things.

The main point of When Your Grades Are Based on Labor and Labor Log is to describe a different way of grading assignments. Assignments would be graded based on the time and effort that students put instead of mistakes. The author’s main point is that this grading system will help students become better writers. I like this grading system because it allows students to try new things without having the risk of receiving a bad grade. Also, students will receive a good grade as long as they work hard. I remember a lot of times I would work really long on an assignment only to receive a bad grade.