Daily Archives

3 Articles

Posts/Week #1 Response

zhihong week one response

Posted by ZhiHong Li on

 

After reading the cartoon, I think the idea that the cartoon reading is trying to express the point that people view the word or idea differently. Some think it is positive and some think it is negative. On page 36 the way people using the word “rhetoric” make Elizabeth Losh(one of the character in the cartoon) feel annoying which indicates the negative connotation of how people don’t understand the meaning of the word rhetoric. But it means the way of writing or speaking technique. In the cartoon Aristotle think rhetoric is about ethos, pathos and logos which his teach think he is in his own idealistic world (false world). The rhetorical question is the way to let people think of the important point in the question, but just like the cartoon showing how people think the rhetorical question is to end the conversation. The way people understand the idea make the “rhetorical question” to have the different connotation. I have experience that when I first learning English as second language, my teacher told me that when asking a “rhetorical question” there should not be an answer to the question. And I try to use rhetorical question to end the conversation in the discussion and my teacher ask me what the question is and what is the point of the question then I told my teacher that is the way I understand the rhetorical question. So, this will be different understanding of the idea because of the way people function over their brain. I agree with the key point that people view the word/idea differently according to the understanding of the explanation of the word/idea. Which the language barriers and the differences between people proceed the different connotation of the word/idea, the meaning people apply to the word/idea will depend on the way people understanding it.

Digital Receipt #1/Digital Receipt #1

QianXing’s Digital Receipt #1

Posted by QianXing Ou on

(NOTES) Understand Rhetoric:A Graphic Guide to Writing

-From Greek : word EIRO-to say

-Questions don’t require an answer

-talk and perform/thinking

-Plato

-Rhetorics are false

-teachers are bad, only giving orders.

-Affects teens using tragedy.

– teens might pick up the negative aspects inside the tragedy show.

-Life a lot better before writing.

-ARISTOTLE (student of Plato)

– Rhetoric is foundation of education.

 

Ethos:Credibility

Pathos: usage of emotion

Logos: have to make sense/logical.

Kairo: Rhetoric is also about time

  • Use certain words in certain situation.

-Debates are very sensitive to time.

– Think before sending an email

 

When Your Grades Are based on Labor

Mistakes do not matter that much, focus on your ideas.

-Don’t try to show off

-Willing to take risk

-It is always nice to redo a assignment

-Work harder!

 

Week #1 Response/Week #1 Response

QianXing’s Week 1 Response

Posted by QianXing Ou on

In “Understand Rhetoric:A Graphic Guide to Writing,” it talks about  many elements of writing such as rhetoric, pathos, ethos, logos, and kairos.  Rhetoric was originated from the Greek meaning to say. Basically, it means to give a space to a person to express their ideas. These includes shows, speeches and debates.  One of the Greek philosopher named Plato thought negatively about rhetoric. He thought that shows such as tragedy has negative effects on teens because teens might pick up some negative things from it.  On the other hand, Aristotle believed performing tragedy in front of teens will let them know the dangerous of doing so, which prevents them from doing it. In this case, I agree with both of them because I think shows are not the only factor that affect teens.  While it might be true that teens might pick up negative aspect from the show such as smoking and drinking alcohol, it doesn’t mean teens will always absorb these negative things, and some might even resist that. For example, when I was little, I keep watching shows about how a person betray another person. That doesn’t affect me.  I hate betraying. Therefore, even though I don’t think rhetoric in a show affect a child’s growth, sometimes it is true since child are most likely to be affected by his/her surrounding. ( I stay neutral) Also, the author is also trying to show us the importance of pathos(use of emotion), ethos(credibility), and logos(logical) in the writing. I agree with that because we need credibility, emotions and logical in our writing. Even though pathos might not be that effective in a lot of writing such as research paper, it is very effective during speeches, shows, or sometimes debate.  Personally, I think emotions are the most powerful weapon in the writing. If a speaker is having a poor background or any forms of tragedy, the speaker will mostly likely to receive more attention compare to other speakers. Also, when a character in a movie is having a poor family background, the audience will likely to feel pity about this character and want him/her to complete his/her goal. The author also introduce Kairos, which is about the importance of time. We don’t want to say any negative things during a birthday party.

The article “When your grades are based on labor” has 5 main ideas. Don’t be afraid to make mistakes, take risks, don’t write to impress others, redo the assignment might be a good thing and work harder!  I agree with these, because I was afraid of making mistakes before, so I never learn. However, right now I don’t care about mistakes, I just try , try and try until I am satisfied about my assignment. And it worked.  I learned more things and I feel more confident about myself.

Skip to toolbar