Category Archives

13 Articles

Weekly Responses/Week #1 Response

Kevin’s Weekly Responses #1

Posted by Kevin Yu on

After reading “Understanding Rhetoric: A Graphic Guide to Writing”, I have found a new meaning to rhetoric thanks for the authors Elizabeth Losh, Jonathan Alexander, Kevin Cannon, and Zander Cannon. When the authors initially introduced the idea of rhetoric, I perceived the connotation of rhetoric to be the kind that is involved in media and politics; no thanks to the recent political turmoil. In this way, I can relate the point that the authors make about rhetoric as being perceived as deception because when I first hear that word, I immediately think of the negative connotation of “rhetoric”. However, the comic quickly changed the meaning of rhetoric for me around page 11 when they introduced the parts that rhetoric can be broken up into and how its usage can be connected to social media. The way people nowadays post on social media is a strong reflection of the three fundamental ideas of rhetoric; ethos, pathos, and logos. In ethos, I have seen a lot of professionals who work for big companies who post pictures or videos that can compromise their work integrity and professional credibility just like how Jonathan in the comic is when he posts pictures of himself getting intoxicated. For pathos, there are more posts and videos than I can count that use texts and pictures to draw attention to themselves for likes, comments, or shares; this is more evident on Youtube. Lastly, there’s logos that accounts for statistical or facts that I have seen used in a positive and negative way. In logos’ positive side, you can use statistics or percentages that are true to prove a point, but on the negative side, you can use it to promote a negative connotation behind something. For example, using it in a positive way would be, “People who eat desserts are 75% happier than those who don’t, se we should eat dessert all the time”. In a negative way, it would be, “If you do not turn in your assignments, your grades will suffer”. Both sentences use logos, but it can be used to give off a positive or negative connotation. Overall, the way that the authors present how rhetoric is used in the 21st century in the age of electronics and social media is a good way to help readers and consumers of this era identify and learn that everything that we do is related to rhetoric from the basic ideas of ethos, pathos, and logos.

Week #1 Response/Week #1 Response

week #1 response

Posted by Tanvir Youhana on

The authors main point was to shed light on the history of how rhetorics came to be about and how to use them in writing through examples in the comic. I see that the author shows that during the early times, people didnt really like the thought of rhetoric and didnt embrace it till Aristotle. This leads into the main point that rhetoric has been around for many centuries and has always been part of writing. Another main point that was seen in the comic was that to be effective at writing one must have three componenets. These components are ethos,pathos, and logos. I agree with this claim becuase I have written with these components last semester in my freshman english class. This can go to shows that I used these three components of writing without even knowing the name of them. This goes to show that rhetoric has been around for many generations and that we always use it involuntarly when we write. Another point made by the author is Karios. Karios is the timing of your writing. The author makes the point that we should make sure that our writing isnt rushed or else it might not come out as well as we would expect it to. I agree with this in that I have written essay the night before the due date and things recieved a decent grade. However, when you plan out your writing and organize all your ideas on paper, things become easier and the ideas flows easily on the paper and the result is better than something that was rushed. Documenting our work is also important because it allows us to get back to our work later on and make sure that we didnt miss anything if we kept on writing. This is another point that was made in the labor log. It is always a good idea to evaluate yourself and this way you can catch your mistakes faster.

-Tanvir Youhana

Week #1 Response/Week #1 Response

Kayla’s Week 1 Response

Posted by Kayla Ye on

Authors Elizabeth Losh and Jonathan Alexander are both experienced in teaching about the art of writing. In the comic in which they contributed to, “Understanding Rhetoric A Graphic Guide to WRITING”, they are teaching the reader about the deceptive connotation it possesses, and the history behind it. Losh and Alexander have stated on page 36 that rhetoric has a bad reputation because it’s often used in regard to politics and how politicians always use rhetoric to lie their way into office. I agree with this point because when I first was introduced to rhetoric, it seemed as if it was a way for people to sugar coat what they really were trying to say in their writing and trick the readers into agreeing with their point. However, upon learning more about rhetoric, I learned that rhetoric is a way to write to strengthen the argument. By using logos, pathos, and ethos, the author is using methods to show that the argument has a point and why its logical to agree. Losh and Alexander have also showed throughout the comic the orgins of rhetoric. Dating back to Ancient Greece when Plato believed that rhetoric was a way to lie about the truth to today when people use rhetoric everywhere without even realizing- on online profiles, for example. Losh and Alexander have introduced me to kairos, the opportunity for speaking meaning that it is important to know the appropriateness and the timing of having a voice on the topic. I am in agreement with this point because one should consider the long-term effect of voicing their opinion. Are they responding to the topic because everyone else is or is it for a purpose? An example of this would be the travel bans enacted by President Trump. Many have voiced their opinion on this topic and in this case, the topic will be brought up constantly and its one that someone will always have an argument for.

Skip to toolbar