Daily Archives

6 Articles

Reflection #2/Reflection #2

Project #2 Reflection

Posted by Tanvir Youhana on

I think that I did well on project number two because I was able to meet all the requirements for the task and more. I think I did well describe the mouse and its functions. I thought I would take it one step further and see if I could include some visual as to better clarify my description and label the parts of a wireless mouse as well. This was what made my project stand out and clearer to the reader. I also thought about if I needed to include some background information that was needed to better help the reader understand where the mouse came from and why it is used today. So, it can be said that I was pretty good being able make my writing as clear as possible. I struggled with finding good images to show each part of the wireless mouse. To overcome this, I realized that I had my own mouse that was wireless, and I took pictures of that to show the different parts of a wireless mouse. With all this in mind I think my paper is worth a grade of 98.

-Tanvir Youhana

Reflection #2/Reflection #2

Jaspreet Jaswal Reflection #2

Posted by Jaspreet Jaswal on

Throughout the second project, I feel as if I did an ok job in terms of describing my item. My item , known as Runite blade, pertained to the game League of Legends in which multiple players verse each other using their own champion. Initially, I described my object to be something as rough since the sword Riven carries is broken. The Sword however revives into a full blade when the ultimate is activated and I also described the transition to how the sword went from a rough texture to a smooth texture with a sharp peak when the special is activated. In terms of describing how much damage the sword is able to conduct, I feel as if I also did a good job explaining how various inventory items can boost up the attack damage of the sword. Overall, I feel I did a good job conveying my audience the purpose of Riven’s sword and it’s attributes. I think I deserve a grade of 97 on this because I feel like I hit the main points, but for some reason I feel as if I missed some small points as there is not much description about the sword online.

Week #9 Response/Week #9 Response

Jaspreet Jaswal Backpacks vs Breifcases

Posted by Jaspreet Jaswal on

Backpacks Vs Briefcases by Laura Carroll, discussed the significance of rhetorical perusal while simultaneously discussing how we play over rhetoric in our everyday lives. In the text, Caroll initially brings the conversation of rhetoric by implying how we are quickly able to judge another person based on their appearance and style of choice. Carroll goes into detail further on when talking about the media and how their tactics impact us on daily basis- “Understanding rhetorical messages is essential to help us to become informed consumers, but it also helps evaluate the ethics of messages, how they affect us personally, and how they affect society”. Carroll initiates the conversation about ethos, logos, and pathos and correlates those concepts to the idea of rhetoric.  I myself practiced rhetorical analysis throughout my life since I have also been following sneaker trends and fashion trends as the media portrays it. In High school, you were not considered one of the ‘cool’ students if you didn’t have the latest releases of jordan retros.

Week #9 Response/Week #9 Response

Geetangalie’s Weekly Response #9

Posted by Geetangalie Goberdan on

“Backpacks vs. Briefcases: Steps Towards Rhetorical Analysis” by Laura Bollin Carroll explains the necessity of using rhetoric in everyday life. Understanding rhetoric is a principle part of being a well-informed consumer as we are not simply being brainwashed by the media. Taking the time to analyze situations, whether it be why or how the matter relates to you and its importance, provides us the ability to not give in to the persuasion of these creators without purpose. Laura Carroll also addresses how we as humans make rhetorical analysis so routinely, that it has become habitual. Just like the example Laura Carroll continuously refers back to in this article with the meeting a new teacher for the first time, I had done the same with my current best friend. Occurring in practically the same classroom we have our English class in, this last summer semester we had our first college class together. On the first day of class, as everyone piled into the classroom I had scanned the room to see what my peers were like. Being my first ever class at the City College of New York I wanted an insight on what my next four years would be like. As I looked around the room, I noticed a lot of diversity within my fellow classmates, not only limited to race but personalities. When I had first seen Reem, my best friend, I had judged her based on her looks. From the way she dressed to her body language, she had come off to me as a stuck up and arrogant. I analyzed the way she spoke to the professor and her shyness came off as being rude from what I could hear. It wasn’t until we sat next to each other and started talking that I got to know her for who she really is. Therefore, we must not always use the judgments we made off of rhetorical analysis as solely our understandings of things.  

 

Skip to toolbar